The U.S. Justice Department charged the 45th President of the United States on Tuesday with 37 federal crimes including; willful retention of national defense information; conspiracy to obstruct justice; withholding a document of record; corruptly concealing a document or record; and false statements and representations. Each charge carries a $250,000 fine and prison sentence of 5-20 years. The Justice Department is seeking "a speedy trial on this matter consistent with the public interest” in the matter of the United States of America vs. Donald J. Trump.
While the defendant currently leads a crowded Republican contest in the U.S. Presidential Election 2024, Tuesday’s indictment triggered a surge of support for his cause. Over 75% of all Republicans believe the indictment is politically motivated, and while 35% (Always Trumpers) are offset by 10% (Never Trumpers) it appears the sentiment is coming from the remaining sweet spot of 55% (Maybe Trumpers). While indictments from Georgia and Washington are looming, the prospect of a former president facing four criminal trials in four separate jurisdictions while campaigning for president is without precedent in the republic.
Disgruntled by an FBI investigation into Donald Trump's handling of government documents, Republicans in the 118th Congress vowed to create the United States House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. It was established to investigate alleged abuses of federal authority, including collusion between federal agencies and the private sector with a simple question:
Does the United States federal government violate the civil liberties of American citizens for political purposes?
A year after leaving office, the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) retrieve 15 boxes from the private residence of the former President Donald Trump in January 2022. Suspicious he's not complied with the Presidential Records Act, NARA informs the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) who begin a criminal investigation.
In August, an FBI raid at Mar-a-Lago seize and recover over 13,000 documents, 300+ of which are marked — Top Secret (25), "Secret" (92) "Confidential" (67) — but were the documents declassified, the private property of the former president, or a violation of The Espionage Act? To prove which, the Independent Special Council led by Jack Smith would need to pierce the attorney-client privilege of Donald J. Trump by deposing his personal attorney, Evan Corcoran.
A federal judge in Washington rules that Corcoran’s conversations with his client are not shielded by Attorney-Client Privilege — an iron clad confidentiality agreement between lawyers and their clients — if and when a client’s comments are made in furtherance of a crime. Called the Crime-Fraud exception, Corcoran’s forensic notes and voice recordings give the government a roadmap for prosecution.
Regarding the NARA's inquest, Corcoran transcribes his client saying:
• I don’t want anybody looking;
• I don’t want anybody looking through my boxes;
• I really don’t want you looking through my boxes;
• What happens if we just don’t respond at all, or don’t play ball with them;
• Wouldn’t it be better if we just told them we don’t have anything here;
• Isn’t it better if there are no documents?
William Barr, the former US Attorney General who served under Donald Trump, told CNN, “Trump is toast if allegations he mishandled classified documents are proven to be true.” Former national security advisors and former US prosecutors agree that the “DOJ will seek incarceration for Trump if convicted.” The trial is expected to get underway in Miami next year.
However, this article isn’t really about The Presidential Records Act > The Espionage Act, or even if or whether the former president tantalized his dinner guest at Bedminster with state secrets and battle plans. It refers in particular to DOJ guidelines that discourage all prosecutions that could foil or effect a federal election, and asks only if the occupants of the White House, past and present, had considered using the office to discourage FBI raids of former presidents, perp walks through Miami courtrooms, or a self-coup from the top in lieu of a free and fair election?
In 64 BC Marcus Cicero, Rome’s greatest orator, ran for Consul: the highest office in the Roman Republic. His practical brother, Quintus, decided he needed some no-nonsense advice on running a successful campaign, and in a short letter offered some timeless tidbits of political wisdom:
Remind voters about the sexual scandals of your opponent; Shroud their activities in controversy; Rehearse their ineptitudes publicly; Remain omnipresent before the people.
The humble art of personal politicking was dead-on (Cicero won) and is as relevant today it seems as when it was written. Sadly, Cicero was assassinated by Mark Antony who played a pivotal role in transforming the Roman Republic from a constitutional republic into the autocratic Roman Empire. Indeed, a great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.
For whence falls the coliseum; Rome shall fall; And when Rome falls—the World.